2026-08-17



Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • Bankruptcy, Not Forgiveness: It Is Time to Reform America's Student Loans

  • If you had trusted the settled science of the day here is how it would have gone

  • When Astronomy Morphs Into Astrology

    the committee of 10 eminent scholars that drafted and unanimously approved the “Report on the State of Scholarship in the Humanities and the Humanistic Social Sciences” takes the path of reasoned criticism. Commissioned by Vanderbilt University Chancellor Daniel Diermeier and Washington University Chancellor Andrew D. Martin, what has come to be called the Vanderbilt report since issued in April has provoked lively controversy. Notwithstanding divergent methods and tone, the report’s conclusions about the decline of the humanities converge with those Sokal reached 30 years earlier.

    While finding examples of serious scholarship in the core humanities fields and humanistic social sciences that it examined, it identified in each “pathologies” to varying degrees. In each, the committee observed professors who view scholarship as politics by other means and who reject the very idea of objectivity while touting their judgments about injustice and justice as objectively true.

    The problem is not that numerous humanities professors are decidedly progressive but rather that they import progressive articles of faith into their scholarship. The problem is not that numerous humanities professors are politically active or that they use scholarly findings to defend or criticize public policy but rather that they lower or disregard intellectual standards to concoct politically useful results. The problem is not that numerous humanities professors have broadened their remit from the great books to the writings and experiences of historically marginalized groups but rather that they neglect, where they don’t demonize, classic works and conflate study of and advocacy for the marginalized. And the problem is not that humanities professors adopt a critical or debunking stance toward conventional norms, practices, and institutions but rather that they reflexively revile the great works of the West and mechanically besmirch the American political tradition.

AI Will (Save | Destroy) The World

World

Health / Medicine

  • Have Another Drink!

    This analysis was commissioned by the US goverment. It has a deceiving title and a deceiving summary conclusion: “At low levels of consumption, no protective net effect of alcohol consumption on health was observed.”. Their claim is that lifetime alcohol-attributable mortality risk were >1 in 1,000 at around 7 drinks per week and reached ~1 in 25 (4%) at 14 drinks/week (the established upper guideline limit). It offers a guidance of no more than 1 drink per day (or less). Table 1 in the paper shows data that doesn’t fit the narrative (there are obvious gains from alcohol at low levels, and high standard errors) and, worse, some methodology that is obscure enough to be suspicious.

  • Scientists Identify 3-Minute Exercise Better than 90M one