2025-11-27


etc

  • How a Government Think Tank Trained The First Generation of US Software Developers

    RAND’s radar operator performance studies made it an obvious candidate for programming the SAGE system. Not only was RAND already working on the problem of processing radar station data, but to do so it had already hired a substantial fraction of the programming talent in the US. In 1955 RAND employed 25 programmers, at a time when there were only an estimated 1200 programmers in the entire country, only 200 of which were creating programs of substantial complexity. In 1955 RAND agreed to take on the task of programming for the SAGE system, and by the end of the year 75 people at RAND’s System Development Division were working on SAGE.


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

TechSuck / Geek Bait

  • memories of .us

    RFC 1480 is a very interesting read. It makes passing references to so many facets of DNS history that could easily be their own articles. It also defines a strict, geography-based hierarchy for the .us domain that is a completely different universe from the one in which we now live. For example, we learned above that, in 1993, only four-year institutions were being placed under .edu. What about the community colleges? Well, RFC 1480 has an answer. Central New Mexico Community College would, of course, fall under cnm.cc.nm.us. Well, actually, in 1993 it was called the Technical-Vocational Institute, so it would have been tvi.tec.nm.us. That's right, the RFC describes both "cc" for community colleges and "tec" for technical institutes.

    You look at Reddit these days and see all these usernames that are two random words and four random numbers, and you see that Postel and Cooper were right. Flat namespaces create a problem, names must either be complex or long, and people don't like it either. What I think they got wrong, at a usability level, is that deep hierarchies still create names that are complex and long. It's a kind of complexity that computer scientists are more comfortable with, but that's little reassurance when you're staring down the barrel of "bridger.pps.k12.or.us".

AI Will (Save | Destroy) The World

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

  • Senate Committee to Challenge Auto-Safety Mandates That Hurt ‘Affordability.’

    Senate Republicans in January plan to criticize requirements for safety technology, such as automatic emergency braking and alarms to remind drivers that a child is in the back seat, arguing they are ineffective and will unnecessarily drive up the cost of cars, according to people familiar with the situation. They aim to head off future requirements touted by safety advocates and argue instead for advancing autonomous vehicle technology.

    • "Let the market find out what people want" is apparently still not an option.

Left Angst

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security