2026-01-07


Worthy

  • America Was Never a Christian Nation - by John Paul Wile

    The founders created something genuinely new: a government that doesn’t care what you believe. That was radical. That was the actual American innovation. Christian nationalism wants to undo that achievement and return to the old European model of religious/political fusion that failed everywhere it was tried. The real American principle is that your neighbor’s different beliefs don’t threaten you because the government won’t enforce either of your religions on the other. Christian nationalism rejects that mutual respect and tries to install Christianity in a privileged position - which inevitably means someone’s particular version of Christianity gains state power while others lose freedom. The founders gave us religious freedom by keeping government secular. That’s the principle worth defending - for Christians and non-Christians alike.

Horseshit


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

  • Psychological traits that may fuel conspiracy theorist mindset identified

  • The Influentists

    This pattern of “hype first and context later” is actually part of a growing trend. I call the individuals participating to that trend “The Influentists”. Those people are members of a scientific or technical community, and leverage their large audiences to propagate claims that are, at best, unproven and, at worst, intentionally misleading. But how can we spot them?

    I personally identify these “Influentists” by four personality traits that characterize their public discourse. The first is a reliance on "trust-me-bro" culture, where anecdotal experiences are framed as universal, objective truths to generate hype. This is a sentiment perfectly captured by the “I’m not joking and this isn’t funny” tone of Rakyll’s original tweet, but also the dramatic “I’ve never felt that much behind as a programmer” from Andrej Karpathy’s tweet. This is supported by an absence of reproducible proof, as these individuals rarely share the code, data, or methodology behind their viral “wins”, an omission made easier than ever in the current LLM era. And finally, they utilize strategic ambiguity, carefully wording their claims with enough vagueness to pivot toward a “clarification” if the technical community challenges their accuracy.

  • A brief natural history of misinformation

TechSuck / Geek Bait

Trump

Democrats

Left Angst