2026-06-24


Worthy

  • The situation for free speech in Europe is even worse than I thought

    Here’s one of the most surreal cases I’ve seen: a 34-year-old mother of four, Elizabeth Kinney, who says she was beaten badly enough by a man to require hospital treatment. In private text messages to a friend afterwards, she called him a “faggot.” The friend reported her, and prosecutors charged her under the Malicious Communications Act. She pled guilty and was convicted of a homophobic offense, receiving an enhanced community order, unpaid work, and rehabilitation days. As of the last reporting, no one had been charged for the assault. In other words, the woman in the hospital gets a hate-crime conviction; the guy who put her there walks away. If that is your idea of “compassionate” law, something has gone badly wrong.

    the most important point to make here is that, if you have even one example of someone being arrested, getting a visit from the cops, or being charged for taking an unpopular position on one of the biggest political hot-button issues in a society — immigration, crime, religious fundamentalism, religious expression — they will not trust what they hear in the media, or even what they hear in society, as being genuine or authentic. This leads to a genuine epistemic crisis, where people cannot tell what their countrymen honestly think, or what the world actually looks like in terms of public opinion and perception — and that is a disaster. People in control, or at the top of society, can be such fools in thinking that if they could just better control the opinions people express, popular opinion will go right along assuming the preferred ruling class’ position is correct. But that relies on a model in which people are even stupider than ruling class people often assume they are. What happens instead is people conclude that no one is saying what they really think, and that the media, politicians, and even their fellow citizens cannot be counted on to show what they really think — because if there’s even the slightest risk of being arrested or punished for it, who would?

Horseshit

Obit


Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • The Lure of "Magic Bullets" in Reforming Schools

    Elderly readers may remember “Career Education” in the 1970s; “restructuring schools” in the 1980s; “systemic school reform” in the 1990s. Middle-aged readers may recall parental “choice” of schools and vouchers in the 1990s when John Chubb and Terry Moe pronounced it as a “panacea.” And since the 2000s, champions of “magic bullets” have touted Common Core curriculum standards, teacher pay-for-performance plans, charter schools, Teach for America, and principals as instructional leaders as ways of turning America’s failing schools into winners.

    For nearly two hundred years, schools have been expected, at various times, to create engaged citizens, instill moral character, sustain community values, reduce social inequities, prepare youth for the labor market, and produce independent thinkers. Since the early 20th century, determined reformers have dreamed of improving government, society, and culture through schooling the young. Yes, achieve all of these competing purposes and, in addition, solve serious problems from poverty to slow economic growth to defending the nation, and even reducing obesity.

  • Where Did the K-12 Money Go? Lessons from the Front Lines

    Student population grew 25%. Admin and support layers and their costs rose 400–500% or more.

TechSuck / Geek Bait

AI Will (Save | Destroy) The World

Democrats

  • What is Gavin Newsom doing?

    these early polls do have some predictive power, believe it or not. Prediction markets have tracked with them, with Newsom’s probability of winning the nomination declining from 35.5 percent on Jan. 1 to 23.3 percent today. No one opponent has emerged as the obvious alternative. Bettors see the field as wide open, with the top six candidates having less than a 60 percent combined probability of winning the nomination. But it’s worth noting where the biggest gains have come from: Kamala Harris and Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Each presents a challenge for Newsom. Harris, who might or might not be serious about running again, is from the same state, and it’s hard to find much daylight between her and Newsom on policy. And Ossoff, you could argue, mogs Newsom in the “good-looking white guy” category, only with youth on his side and the credential of actually having won elections in a swing state. If you ask me, though, the reason for Newsom’s decline is simple: this is reversion to the mean. He doesn’t have a particularly persuasive argument for being the nominee, and his early support may reflect name recognition as much as anything else.

  • Read Graham Platner’s Demented Joke About Bestiality, Necrophilia, And Incest

    • Bah, that joke was old in the 1990's

Left Angst

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

World

Health / Medicine