2024-04-12


Worthy

  • The DDoS Attack Of Academic Bullshit - Ben Landau-Taylor

    this might be hard to believe if you haven’t read much academic work from before 1990 or so, but it wasn’t always this way. Sure, it was never perfect, and you always have to read everything with skepticism. But the average quality was much better. Other people have written more deeply than I ever will about the forces that make today’s academic work so shoddy, about p-hacking and publish-or-perish and ideological fads and all that. What I know for sure is that when I read academic work published in 2014, I’m pretty likely roll my eyes and mutter about how no serious person would even bother with this crap and set it aside, whereas when I read something from 1964 then it’s much more likely to be, at the very least, a good-faith effort by a reasonably bright person saying something they care about.

    The dilution of the top experts doesn’t only mean that it’s harder for you and me and the New York Times to tell the first-rate researchers apart from the sea of mediocrities. It’s also harder for those on the cutting edge to find each other. The real ones can tell, when they look deeply at each other’s work, but that takes a ton of time and effort, so it’s not always practical. When an important new theory is published, instead of being circulated and torn apart by the two dozen people whose opinions matter, it’s sent off to some nameless apparatchik for the hollow bureaucratic ritual of peer review, so that the reviewer can demand bogus citations for himself and his friends. Every field has some real scientists doing excellent work. But twenty-nine thirtieths of their peers are cargo cultists, outright fraudsters, or at best just aren’t all that great at their jobs. Much has been made of “impostor syndrome” in academic research. The fundamental cause is that there aren’t enough non-impostors to fill all the positions.

etc

Horseshit


Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

TechSuck / Geek Bait

Economicon / Business / Finance

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

  • USPS Proposes Raising Prices of Stamps to 73 Cents.

  • Why might conservatives have beef with lab-grown meat?

  • Activism is not a Social Club - by Jeremiah Johnson

    There’s a surprising amount of resistance to the obvious, clear logic that Sotomayor should retire and allow a younger liberal justice to take her place. Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s failure to retire in a timely way cost Democrats her seat for at least a generation. If Sotomayor has an untimely death, Democrats could realistically be facing 30-40 straight years of conservative control of the Supreme Court. But you still see arguments like this one all over the place saying “Calls for Sonia Sotomayor to retire are ‘ableism, pure and simple’”.

    Activism is not a social club where the most important thing is to be morally righteous. Activism is not about looking cool to other activists. Activism is not dunking on people on social media. It is not when you ratio someone. Activism is not a participation trophy. You know what mostly doesn’t matter? Having a Latina woman on the Supreme Court. You know what does matter? Improving the lives of millions of real Latina women all over America. Any real activist would trade the former for the latter in a heartbeat. Activism is about standing up for real, everyday people, not standing up for Sonia Sotomayor’s specific right to keep her job.

    Activism is about winning. It is about power. It is about changing the world. If what you’re doing doesn’t lead to concrete change, if it doesn’t WIN, if it isn’t about seizing real power and using it in the messy real world, it’s not activism. It’s political masturbation. It makes you feel good but accomplishes nothing, and it probably makes a mess in the process.

World

China