2025-05-06


Worthy

  • CBS Nominated for Emmy for the Editing of Controversial Harris Interview

    The 46th News & Documentary Emmy Awards nominations are out, and it seems that everyone is talking about just one of them. The “Outstanding Edited Interview” category is hardly a common draw for public or even industry attention. However, one of this year’s nominees is CBS for its primetime special featuring then-Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. The interview is the basis for a $20 billion lawsuit by President Donald Trump against CBS News and its parent company, Paramount Global, alleging election interference due to the biased editing out of an embarrassing answer by Harris. The nomination seems clearly designed to push back at Trump and rally around CBS. (For the record, I opposed this lawsuit on both legal and policy grounds.) However, it sends precisely the wrong message for the media at this time.

    the threats of harassing lawsuits destroy any moral high ground for Trump. It is also entirely unnecessary. As I will address this week at the Library of Congress, the public is leaving mainstream media en masse in favor of new media. Revenue and readers/viewers are dropping for many media outlets. That includes CBS, which has continued to struggle with ratings while refusing to offer more balanced coverage, including a recent controversy over pushing the “baby hoax.” CBS was wrong in the editing of the interview and the nomination of the network for the interview only magnifies that error. However, the Administration should leave this matter to the public and the market to sort out.

etc

  • Carmakers Are Embracing Physical Buttons Again

  • So much blood

    I took that 2% number from a 2024 article in the Economist:

    Last year American blood-product exports accounted for 1.8% of the country’s total goods exports,

    So 0.5298% of goods exports almost certainly use blood, and my best guess is that another 0.1569% of exports also include blood, for a total of 0.6867%.

  • Possibly a serious possibility

    This wasn’t just a one-off problem. It was a structural flaw in how intelligence was being communicated at the time. Reflecting on the experience, Kent categorised intelligence assessments into three categories:

    • Near-indisputable facts, like the length of a runway visible in a satellite image.
    • Judgement or estimate of something knowable, like whether the runway belongs to a military airfield.
    • Judgement or estimate of something unknowable, like whether the airfield will be expanded into a strategic base. Even the adversary may not yet know what they’re going to do with it.

    Kent noted that most intelligence work tends to sit in the second and third categories, where uncertainty dominates. But Kent realised that even among professionals, the language of such uncertainty was wildly inconsistent. Photo interpreters would use ‘possible’ where he would use ‘probable’. And they used ‘probable’ where Kent would say ‘almost certain’.

  • Newark Radar Failure Left Controllers Blind for 90 Seconds

Horseshit


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

  • Conservatives may self-rate as having better 'mental health' because of stigma

  • Everything Is the 'Twitter Files' Now - The Atlantic

    A high-ranking member of the Trump administration is turning federal-government data—in this case, State Department communications—into a political weapon against perceived ideological enemies. The individuals Beattie has singled out (Bill Gates, the former FBI special agent Clint Watts, and Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation researcher who had a short and somewhat disastrous tenure at the Department of Homeland Security, to name a few) are familiar targets for the far right’s free-speech-defender crowd. The keywords Beattie has asked his department to search for (which also include “Alex Jones,” “Glenn Greenwald,” and “Pepe the Frog”) are ones that seem likely to produce a juicy piece of correspondence, but who knows? This is a fishing expedition—a government agency using a kind of grievance-politics Mad Libs in an effort to find anything that might make it appear as if vestiges of the “deep state” were biased against the right.

    Beattie himself has reportedly told State Department officials that this campaign is an attempt to copy Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” playbook. Shortly after purchasing Twitter, Musk picked a few ideologically aligned journalists to comb through some of the social network’s internal records in an attempt to document its supposedly long-standing liberal bias—and moreover, how political and government actors sought to interfere with content-moderation decisions. The result was a drawn-out, continuously teased social-media spectacle framed as a series of smoking guns. In reality, the revelations of the Twitter Files were much more complicated. Far from exposing blanket ideological bias, they showed that Twitter employees often agonized over how to apply their rules fairly in high-pressure, politicized edge cases.

    The Twitter Files did show that the company made editorial decisions—for example, limiting reach on posts from several large accounts that had flaunted Twitter’s rules, including those of the Stanford doctor (and current National Institutes of Health head) Jay Bhattacharya, the right-wing activists Dan Bongino and Charlie Kirk, and Chaya Raichik, who operates the Libs of TikTok account. Not exactly breaking news to anyone who’d paid attention. But they also showed that, in some cases, Twitter employees and even Democratic lawmakers were opposed to or pushed back on government requests to take down content. Representative Ro Khanna, for example, reached out to Twitter’s executive leadership to express his frustration that Twitter was suppressing speech during its handling of the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop.

    • in the spirit of "damning with faint praise" we have "denial with muttered confession." The Feds told Twitter to silence people and they did; regardless of the objections within the company and even among elected officials. Further evidence of who and how must be "pre-bunked" before it comes out.

Electric / Self Driving cars

Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

  • Assassin's Creed gamers harassed a professor over a 'woke' character. She fought back with kindness | AP News

    sachi Schmidt-Hori has never played Assassin’s Creed Shadows, but facing an onslaught of online harassment from its fans, she quickly developed her own gameplay style: confronting hate with kindness. Set in 16th century Japan, the game features Naoe, a Japanese female assassin, and Yasuke, a Black African samurai. Furor erupted over the latter, with gamers criticizing his inclusion as “wokeness” run amok. They quickly zeroed in Schmidt-Hori, attacking her in online forums, posting bogus reviews of her scholarly work and flooding her inbox with profanity. Many drew attention to her academic research into gender and sexuality. Some tracked down her husband’s name and ridiculed him, too.

  • A Popemobile Will Ride Again, This Time into Gaza

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

TechSuck / Geek Bait

Space / Boomy Zoomers / UFO

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Democrats

Left Angst

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security

World

Israel

Pox / COVID / BioTerror AgitProp