2025-09-13



Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

  • The politics of depression: Diverging trends in internalizing symptoms among US adolescents by political beliefs

    We hypothesize that increasing exposure to politicized events has contributed to these trends in adolescent internalizing symptoms, and that effects may be differential by political beliefs and sociodemographic characteristics. We analyzed nationally-representative data from 2005 to 2018 Monitoring the Future annual cross-sectional samples of 12th-grade students (N ​= ​86,138). We examined self-reported political beliefs, sex, and parental education as predictors of four internalizing symptom scales over time, including depressive affect. From 2005 to 2018, 19.8% of students identified as liberal and 18.1% identified as conservative, with little change over time. Depressive affect (DA) scores increased for all adolescents after 2010, but increases were most pronounced for female liberal adolescents, and scores were highest overall for female liberal adolescents with low parental education. Findings were consistent across multiple internalizing symptoms outcomes. Trends in adolescent internalizing symptoms diverged by political beliefs, sex, and parental education over time, with female liberal adolescents experiencing the largest increases in depressive symptoms, especially in the context of demographic risk factors including parental education. It is therefore possible that the ideological lenses through which adolescents view the political climate differentially affect their mental wellbeing.

  • Global press freedom suffers sharpest fall in 50 years, report finds

Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • The Rise of 'Conspiracy Physics'

  • Perceived Importance of College Hits New Low

  • After 10 years of black hole science, Stephen Hawking is proven right

  • The Perverse Consequences of the Easy A

  • Epistemic Collapse at the WSJ | Not Even Wrong

    If you replaced “Streamers” by “Sabine Hossenfelder” this would be reasonably accurate, and a serious discussion of this would have been interesting and worthwhile. Instead, the article is an excellent example of the sort of epistemic collapse we’re now living in. There’s zero intelligent content about the underlying scientific issues (is fundamental theoretical physics in trouble?), just a random collection of material about podcasts, written by someone who clearly knows nothing about the topic he’s writing about. The epistemic collapse is total when traditional high-quality information sources like the Wall Street Journal are turned over to uninformed writers getting their information from Joe Rogan podcasts. Any hope of figuring out what is true and what is false is now completely gone. I was planning on writing something explaining what exactly the WSJ story gets wrong, but now realize this is hopeless (and I’m trying to improve my mental health this week, not make it worse). Sorting through a pile of misinformation, trying to rebuild something true out of a collapsed mess of some truth buried in a mixture of nonsense and misunderstandings is a losing battle.

    • "I know my doctrine is indefensible so I won't try"

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Trump

  • Making Lists - by Francis Turner - L'Ombre de l'Olivier

    the point of police and courts and due process is to stop the lynch mob. The lynch mob is always an option if the police and the courts are unable or unwilling to do the job

  • Trump to deploy National Guard to Memphis to crack down on crime.

  • Trump Administration Seeks Pilot Projects for Air Taxis

  • Some Thoughts

    You are right that most words are not violence. But some words are: Specifically those calling for someone to be killed, or praising an assassin for killing someone, with hopes that additional assassins will emerge. That is what we are condemning. I do grant that some people are making the mistake of attempting to criminalize mere strong political invective -- but what we're really incensed by is that Taylor Lorenz continues to praise Luigi Mangione for his assassination and absolutely zero people in the supposedly "Respectable" media have even so much as chastised her for it. Indeed, CNN had her on to giggle about it.

    This is not a difference of political opinion. We on the right will not have a "debate" about whether leftwing assassins are allowed to murder us, our friends, or our leaders. It's not up for debate. Leftwingers arguing that it is justified to murder me, my friends, and my family, and my president, are not offering a political position. They are openly conspiring to commit murder, and we don't debate murderers. We arrest them and, if necessary, we kill them.

    • They want to be Hamas; allowed license to attack their targets without disapproval; protected from retaliation by the full panoply of Law.

Left Angst

Pox / COVID / BioTerror AgitProp