2025-11-04


etc


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • Ethical Diversity

    People vary wildly in their integrity, the degree to which they’ll actually do what they say they’ll do when it’s inconvenient or costly. Someone can tick every box on your political wishlist and still be the person who harasses female graduate students at conferences or be the department chair who hires his spouse’s catering business for all department events. Someone else might have politics you find abhorrent and still be the one who shows up and supports the team unselfishly. The HxA crowd talks about intellectual courage, about being willing to engage with difficult ideas. They’re silent on the question of whether someone is among the tens of millions who steal in self-checkout lines (15% of users).

    In every organization, you see selective rule enforcement and legitimate policies used as weapons. This creates ‘atmospheric pressure’: bosses won’t threaten explicitly or promise anything directly, but they create conditions where people understand what’s expected and what benefits come from compliance. It’s the president’s chief of staff whose spouse is a photographer ‘available’ for faculty headshots. It’s the dean who mentions the non-profit she raises money for while discussing promotion. It’s all deniable. Nothing provable. But everyone navigates by it. And the downstream effect when leaders behave without ethics is that everyone else does.

    Recognizing ethical diversity would mean building recognition of ethical differences into how we talk about leadership, about institutional culture, about what makes a good colleague or mentor. Institutions have a robust vocabulary for gender, race, ethnicity, LGBTQ, or “first gen” dynamics in professional settings. But we have no language, no model for how to talk about the fact that some people operate with more ethical consistency than others, and that this isn’t the same as political alignment or ideological commitment.

    Everyone reading this likely thinks they’re on the ethical end of the spectrum. Everyone has a story about why their own inconsistencies don’t count, why the gap between their principles and their practice is justified by circumstances. The person who fudged their receipts or claimed a library book was “stolen” had reasons. The ones abusing their position had explanations. Addressing ethical diversity means recognizing that I might be someone else’s example of the problem, that my own sense of my integrity might be less reliable than I want to believe. The viewpoint diversity advocates don’t touch this because it would require the one form of self-examination that’s truly uncomfortable, not whether your politics are correct, but whether you do what you say.

  • The Slow Death of Special Education

TechSuck / Geek Bait

AI Will (Save | Destroy) The World

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Trump

  • BBC 'doctored' Trump speech, internal report reveals

    The BBC “doctored” a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph. A Panorama programme, broadcast a week before the US election, “completely misled” viewers by showing the president telling supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”, when in fact he said he would walk with them “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”. The “mangled” footage was highlighted in a 19-page dossier on BBC bias, which was compiled by a recent member of the corporation’s standards committee and is now circulating in government departments. The dossier said the programme made the US president “‘say’ things [he] never actually said” by splicing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later. It claimed senior executives and the BBC’s chairman had ignored and dismissed a string of serious complaints raised by the corporation’s own standards watchdog.

  • Trump readies US troops for ground invasion in Mexico to go after drug cartels

Left Angst

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security

  • FBI: ‘Potential’ Halloween terror plot foiled; multiple subjects arrested in Michigan.

    “This morning the FBI thwarted a potential terrorist attack and arrested multiple subjects in Michigan who were allegedly plotting a violent attack over Halloween weekend,” Patel posted on X Friday morning. A social media post from the Dearborn Police Department said it was “made aware that the FBI conducted operations” in the city early Friday morning. However, the FBI has not confirmed the location of the arrests or the alleged plot's location.

    Amir Makled, who represents a 20-year-old suspect from Dearborn, Michigan, told the Detroit News he thought there was no conspiracy and said he expected there would be no charges. He told the outlet the young men may have been looking at questionable content online, but insisted there was no evidence of a terror plot in any of their communications. “This is not a terrorist cell,” Makled told the Detroit News. “There was never any planned mass-casualty event or terrorism plot of any kind that I’m aware of. They might have been on some websites or online chat groups that they shouldn’t have been, but nothing that is illegal.” He told WSLS that he did not know "where this hysteria and this fearmongering came from.”

  • Hack Exposes Kansas City's Police Misconduct List

  • 'People will freeze to death' if heating aid doesn't come soon

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

Health / Medicine