2021-09-17


Worthy

  • Scott Gottlieb’s Uncontrolled Spread

    In a jaw-dropping section, Dr. Gottlieb writes that “companies seeking to make the test kits described extended negotiations with the CDC that stretched for weeks as the agency made sure that the contracts protected its inventions.” When every day of delay could mean thousands of lives lost down the line, the CDC was dickering over test royalties.

    In the early months of the pandemic the CDC impeded private firms from developing their own tests and demanded that all testing be run through its labs even as its own test failed miserably and its own labs had no hope of scaling up to deal with the levels of testing needed. Moreover, the author notes, because its own labs couldn’t scale, the CDC played down the necessity of widespread testing and took “deliberate steps to enforce guidelines that would make sure it didn’t receive more samples than its single lab could handle.”

  • A $795M analogy: Locast, broadcast copyright, and the fall of big antenna

    The good news is: copyright is not a right, and intellectual property is not property. That is to say, copyright holders don’t have any natural rights in the Lockean sense. Instead, copyright is consequentialist — an incentive to enrich the public, “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.” This is an interpretation the supreme court has historically stuck by:

    The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an 'author's' creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good. The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors.

  • Entertaining, at least Civil War? - by Dan Scott - Meanderings Of a Common Man


Culture War / Re segregation / Identdoctrination

Media / Many Ministries of Truths / Censorship

Poilitcks

Environment / Climate / Green Propaganda