2023-09-16


Worthy

  • Outdoor Cats and Epistemology

    they argue this way: in their mind, they already know the truth; outdoor cats are invasive and bad for the ecosystem. It doesn't even matter what the other poster says. In fact, you can see this happening very transparently below. They're essentially saying: "it doesn't matter what additional info or circumstances you add, it is a FACT that outdoor cats are bad in this country, why are you trying to argue with fact".

    Their reaction to this seems to be, "I can't explain to you why your personal experience is wrong, but I know it MUST be wrong, because it contradicts scientific fact". Like, they don't seem to even attempt to figure it out, they're not asking any questions or trying to get more information.


Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making