2024-01-19


etc

  • Five Fertility Fails - by Robin Hanson - Overcoming Bias

    most recent discussions of how to promote fertility discuss how we might promote housing, inequality, schooling, day-care, etc., but few consider directly paying parents big amounts to have kids.

  • 'Waddle like a penguin': NHS shows how to walk safely in icy conditions

  • What Happened to the US Machine Tool Industry?

    Being able to manufacture machine tools is often considered an important capability for an industrialized country. Not only does this provide ready access to the latest manufacturing technology, but it ensures production of munitions and other military equipment won’t be bottlenecked by a lack of machine tools. This isn’t a hypothetical concern: American production of artillery shells for Ukraine has been held back by a lack of machine tools. The military has thus historically paid close attention to the machine tool industry and the availability of machinists.

    For most of the 20th century, the US was unrivaled in its machine tool technology, and as late as the early 1980s it was the largest machine tool producer in the world.. But almost overnight, the industry collapsed: annual machine tool shipments declined by more than 50% in 2 years, hundreds of machine tool companies went out of business, and the US slipped from the largest producer in the world to the 4th or 5th (depending on the year), roughly where it remains today.

    Constant pressure to hit quarterly performance targets meant that machine quality often suffered. In some cases, machines would be shipped out the door unfinished so the delivery could be booked, and assembly would be completed by service technicians at the customer’s location. In his history of the American machine tool industry, Albert Albrecht states that “the actions of these larger corporations and conglomerates, under the leadership of financial MBA’s, perhaps more than any other factor, contributed to the restructuring and decline of the US machine tool industry at the end of the 20th century.”

  • The case to legalize single-stair multifamily housing

  • (Jun 2023) Assistant Dictator Book Club: America Against America

Horseshit

  • GovDocs to the Rescue: Debunking an Immigration Myth

    Most Americans are familiar with the idea that immigrants to the United States during the Ellis Island years (1892–1954) had their surnames altered by the processing officials, either deliberately or through ignorance of the correct spelling. A search of the internet on the phrase “name was changed at Ellis Island” yields more than 300,000 hits; variations on the phrase yield even more.

    They are wrong. No one’s family name was changed, altered, shortened, butchered, or “written down wrong” at Ellis Island or any American port. That idea is an urban legend. Many names did get changed as immigrants settled into their new American lives, but those changes were made several years after arrival and were done by choice of someone in the family. The belief persists, however, that the changes were done at the entry point and that the immigrants were unwilling participants in the modifications. Sophisticated family history researchers have long rolled their collective eyes at the “Ellis Island name change” idea.

  • A Moment for Mullets

  • Common sense is not actually very common

    They started by noting that the standard concept of common sense has a somewhat circular definition: common sense is a set of claims that sensible people agree with, and sensible people are those who possess common sense.To get around such philosophical tangles, the researchers turned to Mechanical Turk, a website run by Amazon, a big tech firm, that allows people to post odd jobs. They recruited 2,046 human participants and asked them to rate 50 statements from a corpus of 4,407 claims that might plausibly be seen as commonsensical.

    As common sense might have predicted, the researchers found that plainly worded claims concerning facts about the real world were the most likely to be rated as demonstrating common sense (“triangles have three sides”, for example, which is true by definition, or “avoid close contact with people who are ill”). The more abstract the claims, the less likely participants were to agree that they were common sense (“all human beings are created equal”; “perception is the only source of knowledge”).

  • Technology is stealing your time in ways you may not realise

    The growth in digital tasks is happening, in part, because technology appears to be changing our perception of what free time is for. For many people, it is no longer enough to simply eat dinner, watch TV or maybe do an exercise class. Instead, in an attempt to avoid wasting time, these activities are performed while also browsing the web in search of the ingredients for a more perfect life and trying to develop a sense of achievement. On the face of it some of these tasks may seem like examples of tech saving us time. In theory, online banking should mean I have more time because I no longer need to go to the bank in my lunch break. However, our research suggests that this is not the case. Technology is contributing to a denser form of life.

  • Escaping surveillance capitalism, at scale

  • Professor sets up 1k-year camera shot of Arizona landscape

  • 'Civilizations rise and fall' a community prepping for the downfall of America

  • My grandpa was a Nazi

Obit

  • Dave Mills has died

    an iconic element of the early Internet. Network Time Protocol, the Fuzzball routers of the early NSFNET, INARG taskforce lead, COMSAT Labs and University of Delaware and so much more.


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

Pox / COVID / BioTerror AgitProp

  • Research finds Covid variant with 100% mortality in ACE2-transgenic mice

  • US scientists proposed making viruses with features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan

    drafts and notes uncovered through the Freedom of Information Act reveal fresh details about the intended research. Specifically, the scientists sought to insert furin cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction of the spike protein; to assemble sysetic viruses in six segments; to identify coronaviruses up to 25 percent different from SARS; and to select for receptor binding domains adept at infecting human receptors. The genome of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, matches the viruses described in the research proposal.

  • First SARS-CoV-2 genome was deposited in GenBank earlier than previously known

    The Republican-led Commerce committee, which is investigating the pandemic’s origins, said in a press release that the sequence submission “calls into question how early the [Chinese Communist Party] knew about the virus and how long they withheld this information from the world.” But the Chinese media organization Caixin reported in February 2020 that several Chinese companies had sequenced the virus in late December 2019, before the Chinese government publicized the discovery of a novel coronavirus. And a staffer at the Chinese sequencing company Vision Medicals blogged about its December sequencing results in late January 2020. “The only new piece of information is that the sequence was submitted to GenBank, a U.S.-based database,” says Florence Débarre, an evolutionary biologist at CNRS, the French national research agency.

  • Dengue fever: the tropical disease spreading across Europe

Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

Iran / Houthi / Red Sea / Mediterranean

Health / Medicine