2024-10-12

US stuff is br0k3d, Hot art, War on Hurricanes, Freeze Peach disaster, bots push booze, politics before progress, Archive.org vs Palestine, .io be OK, be acceptable for Obama, SEALS lacked training.


etc

Horseshit


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

  • (Aug 2024) “Cyberpanics” and Global Disinformation Campaigns

    The widescale propagation of misinformation has become one of the greatest threats to humanity. It is, therefore, of utmost urgency for the technical community to work with stakeholders to take strong consensus actions to address the threat.

    On 30 October 1938, the CBS radio network in the United States broadcast a radio play based on H. G. Wells’s book The War of the Worlds. In the play, actor/writer/director Orson Welles used fictitious news flashes to simulate a worldwide Martian invasion. Scholars now disagree on the extent of the panic and fear spread by the broadcast, but this broadcast was effective enough that some people were convinced that the invasion was real, even taking defensive actions (fun fact: autho Phil’s mother, then 10, was “petrified with fear” of aliens breaking into the house and hid in a basement).

    • What a succinct way to show they aim to cure misinformation by ensuring "stakeholders" stories are the only stories, true or not.
  • Americans Blame Politicians for Misinformation

    Americans' top concern around misinformation right now — more than foreign government interference or AI — is politicians spreading it to manipulate their supporters, according to a new Axios Vibes survey by The Harris Poll. "In past elections, there was always fear of misinformation and election interference coming from abroad. But here we see the most likely source of concern is America's own politicians spreading misinformation. "It used to be, we were worried about China or Russia, fake ads or Facebook. Now, no, it's coming from the campaigns."

  • I’m Running Out of Ways to Explain How Bad This Is - The Atlantic

    Even in a decade marred by online grifters, shameless politicians, and an alternative right-wing-media complex pushing anti-science fringe theories, the events of the past few weeks stand out for their depravity and nihilism. As two catastrophic storms upended American cities, a patchwork network of influencers and fake-news peddlers have done their best to sow distrust, stoke resentment, and interfere with relief efforts. But this is more than just a misinformation crisis. To watch as real information is overwhelmed by crank theories and public servants battle death threats is to confront two alarming facts: first, that a durable ecosystem exists to ensconce citizens in an alternate reality, and second, that the people consuming and amplifying those lies are not helpless dupes but willing participants.

    I know it sounds inflammatory, but every piece of evidence points to the fact that we need really aggressive government regulation of speech platforms. The free market doesn’t work and it never will.

    You can only view free speech as an "unmitigated disaster" if your belief system cannot withstand scrutiny. If you insist that your beliefs be shielded from criticism and projected onto the masses, then you're not promoting a political party—you're promoting a religion and attempting to create a theocracy.

Musk

Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

  • (July 2024) Patronage vs. Constituent Parties

    We still see this story play out on the left today. Though the contest for clout has shifted out of the convention halls and out onto social media, when you look at the trajectory of leftist movements over the 2010s—such as the Black Lives Matter movement—you find a similar pattern. Protests that closed with policy defeat, changing nothing but media coverage, did not lead to the marginalization of protest leaders or their moment. Quite the opposite: with each defeat the influence these movements held over the Democratic establishment grew. Why does this happen? Freeman argues that peculiar features of Democratic Party organization and political culture allow activists to profit from defeat.

    This is why the feminist maneuvers in the 1980 convention made sense: whether the feminists won the floor fight was less important than demonstrating that the women’s groups were a constituency capable of forcing a floor fight in the first place. The activists lost their battle, but successfully proved that their army could be mustered, and that its soldiers looked to them for marching orders. They demonstrated that they deserved a larger spot at the negotiating table—and during the next convention they were given one.

    The Republicans are different. In the ‘70s and ‘80s Republican feminists refused to bring losing battles to the floor. Where most Democratic activists view their constituency identity as primary and their party identity as secondary, most of the Republican feminists Freeman worked with saw themselves as Republicans first. Many were the wives of sitting Republican officials. They were not outsiders clamoring for clout but insiders maneuvering for influence. Their party worked in a very different way from the Democrats:

    • Taking a "cause" to defaet in service of the Party's agenda is service worth beign rewarded. The Right doesn't reward people for leading causes they don't brelieve in, succeed or fail.
  • The Danger of Politicizing ‘Freedom’ - The Atlantic

    Freedom in the United States is a word that has had more than one meaning. It has meant freedom for some people and the repression of others. In a democracy, freedom also means the right to take part in politics. So how can that freedom best be secured?

  • Crackdown on dishwashers dealt blow by appeals court in the U.S.

Harris / Democrats

  • 92% were at 3 or more Kamala rallies.

  • Who were those men?

  • Barack Obama calls on more black men to vote for Kamala Harris

    Barack Obama has urged black men to back Kamala Harris in the US election, saying reports of low support for the vice president in the community are "not acceptable".

    He went on to suggest some men "just aren't feeling the idea of having a woman as president", and added: "You're coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses. I've got a problem with that." He then said: "You're thinking about sitting out or supporting somebody who has a history of denigrating you, because you think that's a sign of strength, because that's what being a man is? "Putting women down? That's not acceptable."

Trump / Right / Jan6

  • Opinion | Founder Mode Helps Explain Why Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen Are Backing Donald Trump - The New York Times

    ’m talking about founder mode. A recently coined management style being celebrated by some venture capitalists, it embraces the notion that a company’s founder must make decisions unilaterally rather than partner with direct reports or frontline employees. All too often the extension of founder mode is to resist not only internal checks and balances but also those from the government. I see founder mode as another expression of a creeping attraction to one-man rule in some corners of tech. (I use “man” intentionally, as only 3 percent of venture capital funding goes to solo female founders.) This neo-authoritarianism is nothing short of a rejection of the historical values that made Silicon Valley what it is today. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that a handful of the wealthiest and most powerful venture capitalists there are throwing their resources behind the re-election of Donald Trump.

  • Some Democrats won't commit to certifying a Trump victory

    Raskin, the House Oversight Committee ranking member and former Jan. 6 committee member who objected to Trump electors in 2017, told Axios in an interview that if Trump "won a free, fair and honest election, then we would obviously accept it." However, Raskin said he "definitely" doesn't assume that Trump would use free, fair and honest means to secure a victory. Trump "is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process, whether we're talking about manipulating electoral college counts in Nebraska or manipulating the vote count in Georgia or imposing other kinds of impediments," Raskin said. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), a senior chief deputy whip who voted to object to George W. Bush electors in 2005, said of Trump, "I don't know what kind of shenanigans he is planning," adding: "We would have to, in any election ... make sure that all the rules have been followed."

  • Elon Musk Is Going All In to Elect Donald Trump - The New York Times

    In the final weeks of the presidential campaign, the richest man in the world has involved himself in the U.S. election in a manner unparalleled in modern history. Elon Musk, seen over the weekend jumping for joy alongside former President Donald J. Trump at a rally in Butler, Pa., is now talking to the Republican candidate multiple times a week. He has effectively moved his base of operations to Pennsylvania, the place that he has recently told confidants he believes is the linchpin to Mr. Trump’s re-election. He has relentlessly promoted Mr. Trump’s candidacy to his 201 million followers on X, the social platform formerly known as Twitter that he bought for $44 billion and has used to spread conspiracy theories about the Democratic Party and to insult its candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris.

  • The Law School Dean Who Worked to Overturn the Election

  • Trump campaign asks for military aircraft with antimissile capabilities

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

  • The drownings of 2 Navy SEALs were preventable, military investigation finds

    Two U.S. Navy SEALs drowned as they tried to climb aboard a ship carrying illicit Iranian-made weapons to Yemen because of glaring training failures and a lack of understanding about what to do after falling into deep, turbulent waters, according to a military investigation into the January deaths. The review concluded that the drownings of Chief Special Warfare Operator Christopher J. Chambers and Navy Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Nathan Gage Ingram could have been prevented. But both sank quickly in the high seas off the coast of Somalia, weighed down by heavy equipment they were carrying and not knowing or disregarding concerns that their flotation devices could not compensate for the additional weight. Both were lost at sea.

    • This is smells like rancid bullshit. "SEALS aren't adequately trained?" Really? Bext you'll tell me the rest of the Navy has been allowed to rust into uselessness...

Pox / COVID / BioTerror AgitProp