2024-12-03

recent history, office work sucks, device spying not needed, bible boom, Pokemon and the CIA, Pat stands down from Intel, Joe pardoned Hunter, Trumpist traitors, secret: don't look, hydro-sexuality


Horseshit


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

Religion / Tribal / Culture War and Re-Segregation

  • Sales of Bibles Are Booming, Fueled by First-Time Buyers and New Versions - WSJ

    Bible sales are up 22% in the U.S. through the end of October, compared with the same period last year, according to book tracker Circana BookScan. By contrast, total U.S. print book sales were up less than 1% in that period. "People are experiencing anxiety themselves, or they’re worried for their children and grandchildren,” said Jeff Crosby, president of the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association. “It’s related to artificial intelligence, election cycles…and all of that feeds a desire for assurance that we’re going to be OK.”

  • America has a child marriage epidemic

    Children today have it tough, between grades, drugs, alcohol—and apparently, the threat of child marriage. This isn’t hyperbole. To this day in 2024, thousands of children are beholden to, obliged to, forced into, (what’s the right word here?) child marriage in the United States—and Republicans seem to want to keep it that way. With several thousand documented child marriages every single year—some involving as children as young as 10—we need need legislative solutions and penalties for those who exploit children. But where do we begin? while child marriage is a nationwide problem, Republican states lead the way. Nine of the top 10 states leading rates of child marriage are GOP run states.

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • Not the Right Kind of Provocation - Freddie deBoer

    the pro-phonics case is not nearly the slam dunk people think it is. If you actually dig into the research record, the rapidly-congealed conventional wisdom that phonics instruction is far superior to the whole language model seems much more shaky than anyone lets on.

Economicon / Business / Finance

Democrats / Biden Inc

  • President Biden pardons his son Hunter Biden

    President Joe Biden announced Sunday that he has pardoned his son Hunter Biden, who faced sentencing this month for federal tax and gun convictions, marking a reversal as he prepares to leave office. “Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter,” the president said in a statement. It is a “full and unconditional pardon,” according to a copy of the executive grant of clemency. This official grant of clemency cannot be rescinded by President-elect Donald Trump. By pardoning his son, Joe Biden has reneged on a public promise that he made repeatedly before and after dropping out of the 2024 presidential race. The president and his top White House spokesperson said unequivocally, including after Trump won the 2024 election, that he would not pardon Hunter Biden or commute his sentence. The pardon means Hunter Biden won’t be sentenced for his crimes, and it eliminates any chance that he’ll be sent to prison, which was a possibility. The judges overseeing his cases will likely cancel the sentencing hearings, which were slated for December 12 in the gun case and December 16 in the tax case.

    The long investigation of the Biden Crime Family ended when its principal member extended a “full and unconditional” pardon to its front man for any and all crimes that Hunter Biden might have committed or taken part in from January 2014 through Dec 1 2024. The eleven year pardon by Joe Biden for his son and apparent co-conspirator is unprecedented in both its scope and its brazen shameless criminality. Biden’s pardon begins in the last two years of his vice presidency when the lame duck politician was using Hunter to aggressively monetize his fading political influence by conspiring with oligarchs around the world.

    Republicans called President Joe Biden a “liar” for pardoning his son, who was convicted on gun charges and pleaded guilty to tax fraud this summer. The decision comes after the president said that he would “abide by the jury’s decision” in an interview ahead of his son’s conviction in June, when Biden still topped the Democratic ticket. “Joe Biden has lied from start to finish,” said House Oversight Chair James Comer in a post on X. “It’s unfortunate that, rather than come clean about their decades of wrongdoing, President Biden and his family continue to do everything they can to avoid accountability.”

    Almost always, the King pardons someone after they have been convicted of a crime. That means the doctrine of double jeopardy applies— the person cannot be tried again for the same offense. The next King can therefore not try the person again. If, however, the pardon was issued before conviction, it isn’t so clear. This is more like the King saying he declines to prosecute—- and so long as the statute of limitations has not run out, the King can change his mind about that. A fortiori, the new King could decide to prosecute. Here, though, the pardon does not even specify a crime. How, then, can it bind a future President? How far could this go? Could President Biden pardon, '“for those offenses which they have committed against the United States” not just one particular person, but any member of the Democratic Party? Could he say, “I pardon for those offenses they have committed against the United States in 2024 anybody in my Administration except those who were disloyal to me”? There are limits to pardons. And, indeed, how can we say that the President is knowingly pardoning someone when he has no idea of what the person has done? Suppose it turns out that Hunter Biden was an Iranian spy, something nobody has ever alleged and which would be a complete surprise to us all. How could the President be said to have knowingly pardoned that?

    In a statement, Biden said Hunter was "treated differently" by his own Justice Department, adding that the charges only came about "after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election." "In trying to break Hunter, they've tried to break me," Biden continued, adding "Enough is enough."

    Presidents have pardoned family members in the past. In 2001, Bill Clinton issued clemency for his brother Roger’s 1985 drug conviction. Hunter Biden’s “full and unconditional” pardon was particularly broad, however. It covers his criminal convictions, as well as any future charges for “offenses against the United States” from the start of 2014 to this Sunday. That time period includes two years that Hunter Biden served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma and was involved in other international dealings while his father served as vice-president. Republicans have alleged that Hunter Biden had improperly benefitted from his father’s position of power and that the elder Biden had been connected to his son’s business dealings.

    With Biden’s political career drawing to a close, however, there is little price he could pay for his action. And given that Democrats lost power in both Congress and the White House last month, there are few members of the party in a position of power to face the consequences.

    The Trump camp was quick to issue a response to the news of the Biden pardon, saying that the president-elect would fix the US justice system and restore due process in his second term. It’s something to keep in mind when Trump returns to office, as he is expected to again use his pardoning power to aid associates who have been prosecuted during the Biden presidency – and to free many of his supporters who have been convicted during the 6 January, 2021, riot at the US Capitol. Trump mentioned the 6 January cases when criticising the Hunter Biden pardon, and he is likely to cite the president’s action when he issues his own round of pardons next year.

    In case you missed the key line, I’ll print it again:

    They said it was decided at the time that he would publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.

  • Democrats have a "fool me twice" problem

    in practice, voters tend to care a lot about a sense of feeling betrayed: that a party didn’t live up to its promises (e.g. in the case of Democrats, standing up for oppressed groups) or wasn’t looking out for their interests. In recent years, the Democratic Party’s message has often been simply this: vote for us, or the country gets it, because Trump is even worse. (Actually, political parties have probably always used some form of this message: every election is deemed to be the most important election of one’s lifetime and declared to have existential stakes.)

    there are two times when I’ve felt betrayed by the Indigo Blob, my term for the unofficial alliance between the Democratic Party and the progressive expert class. If you’ve been reading me for a while, you can probably identify them because they’re the two huge fights I’ve had with the left in the past several years. One was with COVID stuff. When the pandemic began, I was one of those people who was like “Welp, we ought to just trust the experts here!”. Many of those experts did a great job under impossible circumstances. But I felt betrayed by a minority who were clearly using the pandemic to advance their political agendas: their utter hypocrisy in endorsing the George Floyd protests after having spent weeks telling everyone to stay home, for instance. And then they did profound harm with prolonged school closures.

    The party has moved away from tangible, material goals. But the abstract goals are hard to fulfill, especially concepts like justice that are seen as a continuous struggle. And then when there’s an emperor-has-no-clothes moment, like with Biden’s obvious decline and half the party refusing to acknowledge it, it calls into question the party’s moral authority as the expert class and reality-based community.

Left Angst

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

Environment / Climate / Green Propaganda