2025-05-17


etc

  • Mutation Explains the Mystifying Color of Orange Cats

  • Rubenerd: An open letter to Gen X

    most of you do something I feel the need to point out. You seem… incapable of sharing what brings you joy in life. At least, directly. You can’t say you’re proud of something, or loved something, or be seen as too enthusiastic or eager for some reason. Everything positive you discuss has to be carefully and meticulously coached in sarcasm, irony, or a sense of aloofness.

    This interests me on a sociological level; it hints at some deeper generational trauma with which I can empathise. But I want to tell you that it doesn’t have to be this way. You can be genuine! One thing I think Gen X and Millennials like me can learn from Gen Z is their willingness to be upfront about their interests, orientations, and dreams. There’s something… disarming about hearing someone open up like that, without qualifications. And boy, if any generation has some shit to share right now, it’s Gen X.


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

  • Why bad philosophy is stopping progress in physics

    You might think that this repeated ‘no’ to wild speculations beyond our best theories would encourage a certain humility in our methodological attitude. Yet I see little evidence for that among many of my fellow theorists, who remain intent on pursuing the next big theory ‘beyond’ those we have today. Why? My hunch is that it is at least partly because physicists are bad philosophers. Scientists’ opinions, whether they realize it or not (and whether they like it or not), are imbued with philosophy. And many of my colleagues — especially those who argue that philosophy is irrelevant — have an idea of what science should do that originates in badly digested versions of the work of two twentieth-century philosophers: Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn.

  • After exam fiasco, California State Bar faces deeper financial crisis

  • It's Breathtaking How Fast AI Is Screwing Up the Education System

TechSuck / Geek Bait

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Left Angst

  • FEMA Head Admits in Meetings He Doesn't yet Have a Plan for Hurricane Season

  • Trump's sanctions on ICC prosecutor have halted tribunal's work

  • US Tech Visa Applications Are Being Put Through the Wringer

  • Political Parties Are Illegal in the United States – J. W. Mason

    It is difficult for many Americans to grasp this point because Americans simply don’t have any experience of a “real” political party. They’ll say “how can you say that the Democratic Party doesn’t exist as a real political party? Democratic Party powerbrokers, including shadowy donors and prominent politicians, screwed Bernie Sanders and Jamaal Bowman, for example; the party exerted real power.” The objection itself is telling. For Americans, a “party” is a vague and nebulous constellation of wealthy donors, prominent politicians and political brand identifications whose power consists in their ability to coordinate to influence primary voters. That nebulous constellation certainly exists, and it’s not tied to a particular ballot line—many interest groups, like AIPAC and the charter school lobby, coordinate to influence primary voters in both major parties (and could do so in the Socialism Party, too). But Americans tend to miss the glaringly obvious fact that “the Democratic Party,” as a formally constituted institution in civil society—as the DNC and state Democratic committees and so on—is utterly powerless to decide who runs as a Democrat, while the UK Labour Party can ban a prominent and popular former party leader by a simple vote at a scheduled meeting.

  • Outsourcer in Chief: Is Trump Trading Away America's Tech Future?

  • Yarvin's blueprint of a CEO-led American monarchy

  • DHS Is Considering Reality Show Where Immigrants Compete for Citizenship

  • Thanks, Trump tariffs, now I gotta replace my phone battery | The Verge

    After five years, I was still happy with my phone, even though its battery had started the inevitable process of slowing to a stop. But Donald Trump’s tariff nonsense pushed me to make a decision: buy a new phone or fix the old one now, before the prices go up.

  • The Mortality Impacts of Usaid Cuts

  • Nine Federally Funded Scientific Breakthroughs That Changed Everything

  • From free planes to crypto meme coins, Democrats seize on Trump’s deals to raise corruption concerns | CNN Politics

    Democrats are leaning into a corruption argument against President Donald Trump, pointing to his crypto meme coin and plans to accept a luxury jet from Qatar as evidence that the president is potentially violating ethical norms and the US Constitution. It’s a familiar strategy for Democrats and ethics watchdogs, who criticized Trump during his first term as foreign officials sought to curry favor with the president by staying at his hotels. This time, however, Democrats and ethics groups argue that the potential corruption of the second Trump administration has far surpassed the first term. Tiffany Muller, president of the Democratic-aligned group End Citizens United, said that how Democrats message their anti-corruption arguments will be critical. “Voters don’t know who to trust on this issue, and whoever wins that trust battle will win the election,” Muller said in an interview with CNN. “We have to connect the corruption that we’re seeing day to day back to their everyday lives and then also talk about how Trump and the Republicans are using it to line their own pockets.”

    • After the "Biden Brand" redefined corruption...
  • We've Been Thinking About Gun Violence All Wrong

    Even if we can’t do all that much about guns, we can make real progress on gun violence by reducing interpersonal violence. In fact, a growing body of data and evidence shows that preventing shootings in the first place is not only possible, but enormously cost-effective compared to the traditional policies of U.S. partisan politics. This, in fact, is the central problem: going back at least to the 1930s the Left and Right have bitterly disagreed about how to reduce violent behavior. The Right tends to think of violence as being caused by intrinsically bad people who are unafraid of the criminal justice system. The only response, under this perspective, is to try to disincentivize gun violence with the threat of ever-more-severe criminal justice punishments. The Left tends to think of violence as due to bad socio-economic conditions, which leads desperate people to resort to crime and violence in order to feed their families. The only response in this view is to disincentivize violence by improving the alternatives to crime and ending poverty. But the root of gun violence is not what we think it is. Both the Left and Right, despite their heated disagreements, share an implicit assumption about gun violence: That before anyone pulls a trigger, they carefully weigh the pros and cons beforehand. That gun violence is a deliberate, rational act. That’s not what most shootings in America are. Most shootings are not premeditated. Most shootings, instead, start with words—arguments that escalate and end in tragedy because someone has a gun.

    • s/ shooting & guns / stabbings and knives / and you've got the next step of the program, where the UK is at now. Once everyone is disarmed and observed by cameras 24/7 and not allowed to disagree, then finally there will be Peace! We pinky swear!
  • Dems are upset about DOGE's IRS hackathon, but the IRS says it never happened

External Security / Militaria / Diplomania

World

Pox / COVID / BioTerror AgitProp

Environment / Climate / Green Propaganda