2025-07-20


Horseshit


AI Will (Save | Destroy) The World

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Trump

  • "A Treasonous Conspiracy" - DNI Gabbard Exposes Obama At Center Of Trump 'Russia Hoax' | ZeroHedge

    Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has declassified documents revealing "overwhelming evidence" showing how then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would become the years-long Trump-Russia collusion investigation after President Trump won the 2016 election.

    The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,” said DNI Tulsi Gabbard. “Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic. No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.

  • Trump Sues Wall Street Journal Publisher Dow Jones over Jeffrey Epstein Article

  • There's a Lot We Still Don't Know About Jeffrey Epstein

    • The Left's sudden willingness to ask questions on this likely means that Ms. Comey got all the skeletons hidden and new ones in place. Most of these folks will have to explain why their previous reassurances that Epstein was "right wing delusions and Russian propaganda" no longer hold.

Left Angst

  • The Conversations Doctors Are Having About Vaccination Now

  • Fight looms over the NASA budget this fall

  • Fortescue Halts New U.S. Green Energy Projects

  • Gov. Evals Resumes and Paper Reeduction Act

  • Section 174 is reversed! Mostly, that is

    Since early 2024, a tax change in the US named “Section 174” has been plaguing tech companies in the country. It was introduced during the first Trump administration in 2017, came into effect in 2022, and impacted businesses from the tax year of 2023. The next year, many tech companies discovered just how bad S174 is. In this issue, we cover a change on Section 174 — which could have contributed to fewer software engineers hired in the US 2023-2025. However, this was likely not the main cause of the decline. I did more analysis on the actual root cases: the end of zero interest rates in these deepdives.

  • NASA workers plan ‘Moon Day’ protest on July 20 to oppose mass layoffs, budget cuts. ‘This year has been an utter nightmare that has not stopped.’

  • The media has such a bad case of TDS that they are defending high fructose corn syrup now

  • China committee chair calls out Admin's decision to resume GPU sales to China

  • AI's energy demand ratchets up pressure on Republicans

    Meeting the historic escalation of U.S. electricity demand led by data centers will require wind and solar power that President Donald Trump is steering the nation away from, energy executives and members of Congress said during a POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington on Tuesday. But the argument that renewables and battery storage can be deployed has not moved the White House from an agenda that pins the electric grid to coal and natural gas and reverses course on clean energy technology. At the POLITICO summit, industry executives and members of Congress said the approach to energy backed by Trump and conservative Republicans is making it harder to power Silicon Valley’s AI tech companies as they race against China.

  • Where Did All Those Brave Free Speech Warriors Go?

    In this context of actual attacks on free speech, you’d expect the self-appointed Free Speech Brigade to be manning the barricades and sounding every alarm. But where are they? Probably busy drafting another letter about how someone was mean to them on the site formerly known as Twitter. Five years ago, Harper’s Magazine published a fluffy, mostly content-free “letter on justice and open debate.” As someone who has spent decades fighting for and writing about free speech, I found the letter to be beyond useless. While there were legitimate attacks on free speech at the time, the letter did basically nothing to grapple with them. Instead, it used vague language to create a false equivalency between actual attacks on free speech with people just facing some consequences (mainly social opprobrium), mostly allowing people facing the latter to act as though they were facing the former.

    • Most of us aren't allowed to comment on the internet anymore.
  • Our Side is Winning in Court. For the Wrong Reasons. — Women's Liberation Front

    The Supreme Court just decided three cases with enormous consequences for women and girls: United States v. Skrmetti, Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al. v. Paxton, and Mahmoud v. Taylor. To read the majority opinions, you wouldn’t guess that the decisions have anything to do with women’s rights at all. In fact, none of the eleven majority, concurring, or dissenting opinions do more than hint that the rights of women and girls were uniquely at stake in these cases. Each of the three cases pitted the interests of minors against those of groups notably hostile to women, namely, gender ideologues and pornographers. Predictably, in each case the ACLU and similar activist groups filed amicus briefs on the anti-woman side. Opposing these groups, WoLF’s briefs highlight the unique harms to women and girls from, respectively, pediatric medical interventions to alter sex traits, online pornography, and gender dogma taught in school. In each case, the Court cabined its reasoning within existing legal doctrine, refusing to scrutinize gender ideology and online pornography anew, on their own terms, as uniquely pernicious and especially so for women. Though our side won—3-0—the victory feels incomplete. Because while the law refuses to engage with the stakes in these cases–what it means when “gender” supplants sex and porn permeates our culture–it is only a matter of time before the winning streak breaks.

  • RFK Jr. wants to change program that stopped vaccine makers leaving US market

  • The Inconvenient Faith of Stephen Colbert

    This past Monday on his show, Mr. Colbert slammed Paramount and CBS for the settlement, calling it a “big, fat bribe” and further stating: “As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I’m offended, and I don’t know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company.” He’s correct and he’s right to say it, but just days later, in what is clearly an act of political retribution—and possibly part of the actual bribe given Mr. Colbert’s past criticism of Trump—CBS is cowardly eliminating the highest-rated late-night talk show on broadcast television. That’s the political piece of all this, which, alone, is pretty disgusting, but there’s another aspect to why most Trump supporters generally don’t like Mr. Colbert, who is one of the most widely beloved people in all of entertainment. Part of the reason so many of these fools hate Stephen Colbert is that he lives his life as the faithful and humble Christian they constantly claim themselves to be but are too selfish and fearful to actually be. His calm truth and accountability of the Christian faith are unassailable, and that’s what has made him such an uncomfortable threat. I believe the vast majority of folks who support Donald Trump and claim to follow the teachings of Christ are intentionally deluding themselves. There is nothing about Trump’s worldview that aligns with Christ.

  • Is this the death of the late night US chat show?

  • Clawback of $1.1B for PBS and NPR puts rural stations at risk

  • EPA shutters its scientific research arm

  • New York halts offshore wind transmission plan amid federal uncertainty

  • Tech's Top Venture Firm Tried to Stay Above Politics. A Partner Created a Furor

Environment / Climate / Green Propaganda