2025-07-27


etc

  • Crew Members Are Hurt as Southwest Plane Plunges Abruptly After Takeoff

  • In which moderns rediscover social bonding: The Whole Check

    In movies or TV shows about politics, savvy politicians often talk about “owing each other favors”. I’m sure this happens in real life, too. But I also think it’s a caricature of something more common: people in tight-knit groups doing each other low-grade favors constantly, in a way that establishes high trust. Nor is this the exclusive provenance of the rich and powerful: churchgoers are another great example. Parishioners are expected to do minor favors for each other without explicitly keeping score, with the further expectation that if one is in need, the whole will step up and provide.

    In fact, if you’re in a social group that you really care about or are excited by, doing a favor feels like an opportunity. Not because then you’ll be owed a specific favor in the future, but because it shows that you’re invested. Like, if I pick up the whole check in a gathering of several friends, that could mean one of a few things:

    • I want to show off that I can afford it;
    • I want to help my friends out of a sense of altruism;
    • I want to demonstrate the feeling that the value of these friendships to me is so much greater than the cost of a group dinner, that the question of who pays is of no consequence, and it might as well be me.

Horseshit

celebrity gossip


Rank Propaganda / Thought Policing / World Disordering

  • Lying Increases Trust in Science

    This study begins by outlining the transparency paradox: that trust in science requires transparency, but being transparent about science, medicine and government reduces trust in science. A solution to the paradox is then advanced here: it is argued that, rather than just thinking in terms of transparency and opacity, it is important to think about what institutions are being transparent about. By attending to the particulars of transparency – especially with respect to whether good or bad news is disclosed – it is revealed that transparency about good news increases trust whereas transparency about bad news decreases it, thus explaining the apparent paradox. The apparent solution: to ensure that there is always only good news to report, which might require lying. This study concludes by emphasizing how problematic it is that, currently, the best way to increase public trust is to lie, suggesting that a better way forward (and the real solution to the transparency paradox) would be to resolve the problem of the public overidealizing science through science education and communication to eliminate the naïve view of science as infallible.

    • How did "the naïve view of science as infallible" arise? Oops we just stumbled into a century long propaganda campaign to replace religions with blind reverence for "institutions"?

Musk

Info Rental / ShowBiz / Advertising

Left Angst

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security

World

Environment / Climate / Green Propaganda