2023-11-15


Worthy

  • The Religion of Science And Its Consequences.

    While one could interpret “Science” as referring to the epistemological concept of methodologies employed to discern truths, this seems incongruous in our particular context. Instead, “Science” seems to serve as a shorthand for a collective body of research: observations, experiments, and models related to climate change. This body of research presumably “tells us that the sooner we respond to climate change, the lower the risks and the costs will be in the future.” Additionally, “Science” as used here goes beyond the descriptive by implying an ethical obligation to act in a certain way. This violates Hume’s is/ought distinction providing “Science” with a religious character. Blurring the distinction between science and religion (between descriptive and normative claims) leads to the “Believe The Science” disaster observed over the last few years.

    scientists don’t see themselves as regular (well-informed) people expressing their opinions. They think “Science” speaks through them. That’s how to make sense of the strange linguistic observation above. Since all agency is attributed to “The Science,” scientists appear to not have any. Consequently, they can’t be blamed for any mistakes.


Edumacationalizing / Acedemia Nuts

TechSuck / Geek Bait

Gubmint / Poilitcks / Law Making

Law Breaking / Police / Internal Security